If you work in finance, accounts receivable, or accounts payable, you’ve probably seen the promises in your inbox: “Let artificial intelligence handle your deductions.” “Automate disputes end-to-end.” “Close more claims with fewer people.”

Here’s a slightly uncomfortable truth: retailers are already benchmarking you. They benchmark your on-time performance, your fill rates, your chargebacks, your defectives, and your responsiveness when something goes wrong. Programs like On-Time In Full (OTIF) can assess penalties of around 3% of the cost of goods for shipments that are late, early, or incomplete. Some retailers’ chargebacks range from 1–5% of gross invoice when suppliers don’t follow routing guides.

On paper, your deduction report looks clean. You see totals by retailer, maybe a breakdown by code or reason. Someone tells you, “We’re running at about 2% of sales in deductions—pretty typical.” You nod, move on to the next slide, and feel reasonably at peace.

Holiday returns are here—and how you classify them decides whether you pay for them later. You must separate true defective products from shipping damage or policy abuse (like “used once, then returned”) before retailers reset your “excessive defectives” rates. What’s at stake: the wrong label today can lock in higher return allowances or additional chargebacks for months. Fictional example (for illustration): A home electronics brand treated all returns as “defective.”